CloudFuze vs. AvePoint vs. Cloudiway: Slack to Teams Migration
CloudFuze, AvePoint, and Cloudiway are the three most commonly evaluated tools for migrating from Slack to Microsoft Teams. CloudFuze runs migration as a fully managed service. AvePoint’s migration platform is available as self-managed. And Cloudiway is a self-service migration tool.
Which tool is right for your Slack to Teams migration requirement comes down to how hands-on you want to be, how deep your Slack usage goes, and whether you need governance beyond the migration itself.
Key Takeaways:
CloudFuze vs. AvePoint vs. Cloudiway: Quick Comparison
Here is a quick comparison between CloudFuze, AvePoint, and Cloudiway for Slack to Teams migration.
| Features | CloudFuze | AvePoint | Cloudiway |
|---|---|---|---|
| Migration model | Fully managed and self-service | Managed and self-service | Managed and self-service |
| Public channel migration | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Private channel migration | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Direct message migration | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Message properties migration | Full | Partial | Partial |
| Pricing model | Quote based on users and data size | Quote based, per-user/subscription | Bundled pricing |
| SaaS and AI governance beyond migration | Yes, through CloudFuze Manage | Yes, through AvePoint Confidence Platform | No, only Copilot AI readiness assessment |
| AI context and agent migration | Yes | No | No |
Disclaimer: The comparison data presented here is based on information available as of September 2026. It may change as and when the mentioned companies update their products and services.
CloudFuze vs. AvePoint vs. Cloudiway: Channel Migration Capabilities
All three tools handle the core job of moving Slack channels into Microsoft Teams, but the details around private channels, non-admin channels, and merging differ.
| Capabilities | CloudFuze | AvePoint | Cloudiway |
|---|---|---|---|
| Public channel migration | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Private channel migration | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Non-admin public channels | Yes | Not separately documented as a distinct feature. | Requires the migration account to be a member of the private channel to fetch it. |
| Merging multiple channels into one Team | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Channel description migration | Yes | Not publicly documented for Slack specifically. | Not explicitly mentioned as a discrete item in current documentation. |
| Archive channels | Yes | Not specifically documented for Slack. | Not specifically documented. |
| Channel members and permissions | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Disclaimer: The comparison data presented here is based on information available as of September 2026. It may change as and when the mentioned companies update their products and services.
CloudFuze vs. AvePoint vs. Cloudiway: Direct and Group Message Migration
Migration of direct messages is one area where many migration tools quietly cut corners since Slack treats direct messages as private data. Here’s how each migration tool actually handles them.
| Capabilities | CloudFuze | AvePoint | Cloudiway |
|---|---|---|---|
| One-on-one DMs migration | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Group DMs migration | Yes | Not separately broken out for Slack in public documentation. | Yes |
| Self DMs (messages to yourself) | Yes | Not specifically documented. | Not specifically documented. |
| DM member mapping | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Disclaimer: The comparison data presented here is based on information available as of September 2026. It may change as and when the mentioned companies update their products and services.
CloudFuze vs. AvePoint vs. Cloudiway: Files, Formatting, and Message Types
Beyond channels and direct messages, a lot of what makes Slack conversations useful lives in the details, like file attachments, text formatting, emojis, and message states like pinned or saved.
This is also where CloudFuze, AvePoint, and Cloudiway diverge the most, since not everything Slack supports has a clean equivalent in Microsoft Teams.
| Capabilities | CloudFuze | AvePoint | Cloudiway |
|---|---|---|---|
| Attachment files migration | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Audio and video messages migration | Yes | Not specifically documented. | Not specifically documented. |
| Emojis migration | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| GIFs migration | Yes | Not specifically documented. | Not specifically documented. |
| Stickers migration | Yes, where supported by Teams. | Not specifically documented. | Not specifically documented. |
| Text formatting (bold, italic, strikethrough lists) preservation | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Hyperlinks and shared file links | Yes | Not specifically documented. | Yes |
Disclaimer: The comparison data presented here is based on information available as of September 2026. It may change as and when the mentioned companies update their products and services.
CloudFuze vs. AvePoint vs. Cloudiway: Migration Service Type
Who actually runs the migration, and how much control you keep over the process varies a lot between CloudFuze, AvePoint, and Cloudiway. Some teams want a vendor to own the whole project while others want to stay in the driver’s seat. Here’s how each one is set up.
| Aspect | CloudFuze | AvePoint | CloudFuze |
|---|---|---|---|
| Migration delivery model | Fully managed migration, and self-service model for MSPs. | Self-managed and AvePoint-managed migration options. | Self-service SaaS platform. |
| Dedicated migration manager | Yes, assigned for every project. | Available on the AvePoint-managed migration option. | Not part of the core offering. |
| Best fit | Organizations that want migration handled end-to-end and MSPs that want DIY migration options. | Organizations that want flexibility to choose their own level of hands-on involvement. | IT teams comfortable running their own migrations through our guided SaaS interface |
Disclaimer: The comparison data presented here is based on information available as of September 2026. It may change as and when the mentioned companies update their products and services.
CloudFuze vs. AvePoint vs. Cloudiway: Support
Support is what makes or breaks any migration. Here are the types and levels of support each migration vendor provides.
| Support | CloudFuze | AvePoint | Cloudiway |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-migration analysis | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| User/channel mapping | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| One-time migration and validation | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Delta migration and validation | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Post-migration integration support | Yes | Yes | Yes |
At CloudFuze, we provide extensive support every step of the way, be it configuring your migration to overcoming unforeseen roadblocks. Our customer success stories speak for themselves. Check one out below:
CloudFuze vs. AvePoint vs. Cloudiway: Pricing
Pricing structure is one of the clearest differentiators between the migration tools, including CloudFuze, AvePoint, and Cloudiway.
CloudFuze and AvePoint both provide custom quotes based around users and data to migrate, while Cloudiway publishes its bundle pricing upfront.
| Pricing | CloudFuze | AvePoint | Cloudiway |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Tailored quote based on number of users and data size. | Subscription/quote based, typically per user or per object. | Bundle pricing. |
| Licensing | Allocated to project tenure. | Time-bound subscription (monthly/annual). | Based on pricing bundles. |
| MSP pricing | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Free trial/demo | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Support for Microsoft ECIF funding or similar | Yes | Yes | Not explicitly mentioned |
Disclaimer: The pricing comparison data presented here is based on information available as of September 2026. It may change as and when the mentioned companies update their pricing structure.
CloudFuze vs. AvePoint vs. Cloudiway: Security and Compliance
Security and compliance matter as much as the migration capabilities of the tools. Here’s how CloudFuze, AvePoint, and Cloudiway stack up on security and compliance areas.
| Security and Compliance | CloudFuze | AvePoint | Cloudiway |
|---|---|---|---|
| OAuth 2.0 authentication | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| GDPR compliance | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| SOC 2 Type 2 | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| ISO 27001 | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Migration encryption | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Disclaimer: The comparison data presented here is based on information available as of September 2026. It may change as and when the mentioned companies update their pricing structure.
Which Migration Tool Should You Choose?
Choose CloudFuze if you want the Slack to Teams migration handled end-to-end by a dedicated migration team led by a migration manager, and you also need to govern Microsoft Teams and the entire Microsoft 365 and its newer agentic AI areas.
Choose AvePoint if you want flexibility to run the migration yourself, hand it off, or split responsibilities. Choose Cloudiway if we have a dedicated internal IT team comfortable running the migration themselves through a guided portal.
Frequently Asked Questions
1. Which is the best company for Slack to Teams migration?
The best company for Slack to Teams migration depends on your requirements. If you want a fully managed migration service and end-to-end support, CloudFuze is one of the best options. But if you want to go for self-managed options, Cloudiway is worth trying.
2. Tools for migrating business chat messages to Microsoft Teams at large scale?
CloudFuze, AvePoint, and Cloudiway here are some of the tools that are well-suited for migrating a high volume of business chat messages to Microsoft Teams. CloudFuze, in particular, stands out with 12+ years of proven success.
3. What to do after migrating to Microsoft Teams?
If your organization plans to adopt the entire Microsoft 365 suite along with Microsoft Teams for the long run, governing it is extremely important, especially now that Microsoft 365 has agentic AI capabilities.
About the Author: Pankaj Rai
